Managing Support at Home, DVA and Private-Care Clients Side by Side
14 August 2026
Learn more about CareVicinity.
Helpful stories and practical advice to empower independent living.
Help us manage and resolve incidents to improve care outcomes.
Get in touch with the team.
Frequently asked questions about CareVicinity.
Understand your rights when receiving care.
14 August 2026
It's rare for a caseload to stay to just one funding type. You might have aged care clients, a few DVA clients, and some people paying privately, and each one arrived with its own paperwork and its own set of rules.
The usual response is three sets of habits, three spreadsheets and three ways of doing the same job. Here's what genuinely differs between the three, which is a shorter list than it feels like, and how to run them without triplicating your process.
Not because the care differs. A shower is a shower.
It's that the rules governing what you can arrange, what gets recorded, and who pays are different in each case, and those rules live in your head rather than in a system. The cost shows up as hesitation: checking before acting, second-guessing what's allowed for this particular client, and re-explaining the differences to every new coordinator who joins.
Support at Home is the most structured of the three.
Funding is a classification, allocated as a quarterly budget. Participants receive one of eight ongoing funding classifications, determined at their aged care assessment. Budgets are allocated quarterly rather than annually, and unspent funds can be carried over up to $1,000 or 10 per cent, whichever is greater. Around 10 per cent of the amount is allocated to care management, and the figures are indexed each July.
Services sit in three categories, and the category determines who pays. Clinical supports, independence, and everyday living. Participants contribute to the cost of everyday living and independence services. The government pays the full cost of clinical supports.
There's a clock at the start. A participant has 56 days from the date of their letter to enter a service agreement with their chosen provider and start services, with a 28-day extension available through My Aged Care. For a coordinator picking up a new client, that window is the thing to check first, because it's the one deadline in the process that isn't flexible by default.
Practical implication: Support at Home clients need spend visibility across the quarter, and the category of each service matters for what the client contributes.
DVA is a separate pathway with its own approvals, and the difference that matters most to a coordinator is where the decisions get made.
CareVicinity is approved for Veterans' Home Care and general DVA services, and for Household Services. What CareVicinity does not do is decide who qualifies. DVA determines eligibility, not CareVicinity and not you. If a client or their family asks whether they're eligible, that question goes to DVA.
For coordination purposes, the practical differences are in approvals and documentation rather than in the day-to-day support itself. Once support is approved and in place, the work of arranging a worker, agreeing the arrangement and managing shifts looks much like any other client.
Private clients are the simplest to arrange and the easiest to get complacent about.
There's no funding body, no approval process, no classification, no contribution split. The arrangement is between the client and the worker, and you're coordinating it.
The risks move rather than disappear. Without a funding body's structure, the agreement is doing all the work of defining what's included and containing scope creep, and payment issues land directly on the relationship rather than being absorbed by a funding process. There's no external rule to point to if a request falls outside what was agreed, so the agreement itself has to carry that weight.
Practical implication: the agreement matters more here, not less.
This is the part that gets lost, and it's most of the job.
Finding and engaging a suitable support worker. Agreeing what's being provided and on what terms. Scheduling and confirming shifts. Approving what was delivered. Recording incidents. Handling invoices. Keeping the client and their family informed. Managing continuity when a worker isn't available.
None of that changes with funding type. What changes is what governs the spend, what the client contributes, and who approves what at the start.
Once you see it that way, the three-separate-processes approach looks like what it usually is: a habit built up one client at a time rather than a requirement.
The workable structure is one process with a small number of pathway-specific checks, rather than three parallel systems.
CareVicinityPRO is built around that. Authorised organisation users manage multiple clients from one account: creating and managing jobs, managing agreements and shifts, reviewing billing and invoice information, and handling compliance activity, with table views and filters to organise clients, workers, shifts and jobs.
The pieces that matter most for mixed funding types:
Agreements carry the differences. Rather than remembering which rules apply to which client, the agreement is where what's been agreed lives. A shift that falls within an approved agreement can be approved automatically. Time or services outside it come back to you for manual review and approval, which is exactly the check you want when a client's arrangement has boundaries set by a funding pathway.
Billing information sits in one view. You review invoice and billing information in the same place regardless of how the client is funded.
Records are consistent. Incident reports are created, viewed and downloaded the same way for every client, which matters because incident documentation is one of the things that should never vary by funding type.
Stated plainly, because it's the question that determines whether any of this is useful to you.
CareVicinityPRO currently supports Support at Home, DVA and private-care clients. It does not currently support NDIS clients. That's a statement about client-side support, and it's separate from the worker side: CareVicinity can still onboard support workers or providers who meet the required NDIS screening requirements.
So if the clients you're coordinating for span aged care, DVA and private clients - your caseload, in other words - all three are in scope together. If part of your work is NDIS participants, that part isn't covered today.
On cost: coordinators pay no CareVicinityPRO platform fee. CareVicinity's 12.5% platform fee applies to the support worker.
Record the pathway on the client, not in your memory. Every coordinator should be able to see it without asking.
Put the pathway-specific constraints in the agreement, so they're enforced by the workflow rather than recalled.
Check the 56-day window whenever you pick up a new Support at Home client.
Standardise everything that doesn't differ. Intake, worker matching, shift confirmation, incident recording. If your process differs across pathways for any of these, that's habit rather than requirement.
Review spend by quarter for Support at Home clients, not by month, because that's how the budget actually works.
Be careful about eligibility questions. For DVA, the answer is always that DVA decides. Passing that on clearly is more helpful than an educated guess.
What's actually different about coordinating a DVA client? Mainly where decisions get made. Once support is approved, day-to-day coordination looks like any other client. The extra step is confirming that approval is in place before you start scheduling.
How do participant contributions work under Support at Home? The amount depends on the participant's circumstances and the program's own rules, so it isn't something this article can state precisely. What's useful operationally is knowing which of the three service categories a service falls into before quoting a client what they'll contribute.
Do I need different agreements for different funding types? The agreement is where the specifics of each arrangement live, so the content will differ where the arrangement differs. The process for creating and managing them doesn't need to.
If you currently run three sets of habits, the useful first exercise is listing what genuinely differs between them. The honest list is usually shorter than it feels, with everything else duplicated out of caution.
If you'd like to see how mixed funding types work in one system, you can look at what CareVicinityPRO covers for coordinators.